MPs may discuss Prince Andrew’s conduct, his expansive mansion, and the potential removal of his dukedom in Parliament. The Government has refrained from allocating time in the House of Commons for this debate, citing a focus on pressing matters as advised by the Royal family.
Nevertheless, there is a possibility that the matter could be raised on days not controlled by ministers. A source from the Liberal Democrat party hinted at using one of their opposition days to facilitate discussions on Andrew’s behavior.
Amidst controversy over the nominal rent for his Windsor property, Prince Andrew is contemplating leaving his Royal Lodge residence voluntarily. Negotiations with representatives of Prince Charles are ongoing, with challenges surrounding the location of his new home and financial settlements for lodge expenses.
Following allegations of sexual abuse by Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew renounced his dukedom and other titles. However, he has faced criticism over residing rent-free since 2003, overshadowing his efforts to address past controversies.
Rules outlined in Erskine May dictate that discussions about the conduct of the monarch, heir to the throne, or other royal members should not occur unless based on a formal motion. With the Government’s reluctance to introduce a motion to discuss Andrew, an opposition day debate could provide a platform for MPs to raise concerns.
A Liberal Democrat source emphasized the need for transparency and accountability, urging for evidence under oath from the Crown Estate and Prince Andrew. The party has one remaining opposition day in this parliamentary session, awaiting government guidance on its scheduling.
The Lib Dems hope for coordinated action with the monarchy and Parliament, led by the King if necessary. Despite Andrew relinquishing his Duke of York title, only an act of Parliament can officially strip him of it.